Thursday, January 24, 2019

Understanding the high marginal tax rates in the old days

Alexandria "dingbat" Cortez said:
“If you look at our tax rates 
back in the 60’s ...
once you get to like the tippy tops, 
on like your ten millionth dollar. 
Sometimes you see tax rates 
as high as 60 or 70%.”


Some tax facts for "Clueless Cortez":

The United States currently
has a 37% top tax bracket
for Federal income taxes.

Other nation's top tax brackets:
Finland (45 percent)
United Kingdom (45 percent)
South Korea (40 percent)
Norway (38.52 percent)
New Zealand (33 percent)
Hong Kong (15 percent)
Sweden (61.85 percent)
European Union (39 percent avg.)

Back in 2016, 
Bernie Sanders noted
“When radical, socialist 
Dwight D. Eisenhower 
was president, I think 
the highest marginal tax rate 
was something like 90%.” 




In 1955, the only people 
paying 90%
(actually 91%) 
were those making 
over $3,425,766 
when adjusted 
for inflation 
in 2013 dollars. 

Today, there are seven tax brackets. 

In 1989, there were only two brackets. 

In 1955, there were twenty-four !

Back in the 1950s, 
the US government 
wasn’t actually collecting 
any more in tax revenue 
as a percentage of GDP. 

Every year since 1950, 
the government has collected 
between 16% and 20% of GDP 
from federal income taxes.

No matter what the top 
marginal tax rate has been, 
the tax receipts 
have been similar.

In 2017,
income tax receipts
were 17% of GDP.




In fact, the percentage of taxes 
paid by the highest quintile (20%)
of income earners has 
steadily gone up since 1980. 

In 1980, the top 20% 
paid about 55%
of all income taxes. 

Today, it’s almost 70%. 




The top 1% went from paying
about 15% of all income taxes
in 1980, to almost 30% today.

A study from 
the Congressional 
Research Service 
concluded that 
the effective tax rate 
for the top 0.01%
of income earners 
during the period 
of 91% top bracket 
for income taxes, 
was actually 45%. 

Given that the top bracket 
starts as a much lower 
income today 
($3,425,766 in 1955 
vs. $500,001 in 2018), 
the current 37%
top marginal rate 
probably yields 
tax revenues 
something close
to that 45% effective
average tax rate
for the top 0.01%
of income earners
in the 1950's. 





When the personal 
income tax rates 
were reduced 
under president Reagan,
thousands of businesses 
switched from filing 
as corporations, 
to filing as individuals.




Many deductions 
and loopholes
that used to be available,
were eliminated by 
the Tax Reform Act 
of 1986.

For example:
Before 1986, 
wealthy individuals 
would often buy real estate,
that depreciated every year, 
in the eyes of the IRS. 

Even though buildings 
usually go up in value, 
the IRS assumed
that every 27.5 years
( 39 years for a commercial building ) 
a building's value would
officially depreciate to zero.

Example:
Assume someone 
earning $100,000 a year 
buys a property 
worth $275,000. 

He rents out the property 
and breaks even on it. 

The tax code allowed 
this person to write off 
$10,000 a year as a loss,
which can be counted against 
his income for that year. 

So he only has to pay taxes 
on $90,000 of income,
rather than on $100,000. 

That deduction is now gone 
for everyone except “active” 
real estate investors, or those 
who invest in real estate 
as a career.


The rich never paid 
70% or 90% of their 
TOTAL income 
in federal income taxes, 
or any percentage
even remotely close to that. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.