Monday, March 4, 2019

Cost Estimate for the Green New Deal ( The Green Bad Dream ! )

"Alexandria Occasionally Coherent's"
Green New Deal ( Green Bad Dream )
seems to me like a plan to destroy 
US capitalism in a decade.

Even worse, if you believe CO2 is evil
( based on real science, I do not),
the huge infrastructure build of 
solar panels and windmills, would 
temporarily increase US CO2 emissions.

And if China, India, etc. did not have their
own "Green Bad Dream" ( I assume they 
are not that stupid ), total global CO2
emissions would continue to RISE ! 

Three of my February 2019 articles 
on the Green Bad Dream, from a 

I had no idea what the Green Bad Dream 
would cost over ten years, but guessed at
$30 to $60 trillion.

A think tank, run by former CBO director 
Douglas Holtz-Eakin, estimated that
implementing the plan in full 
may cost the US economy 
a staggering $51 to $93 trillion 
over ten years.

The GND calls for a dramatic expansion 
of the welfare state by implementing 
a jobs guarantee, food and housing security, 
and a variety of other social justice initiatives.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin claims elimination 
of carbon emissions would only cost
$10 trillion, which I believe is far
too low.

It would cost over $10 trillion just to replace
all the cars, trucks and busses 
that would become obsolete, 
when gasoline, diesel fuel and
natural gas were no longer available.

Expansion of entitlement programs 
would generate the most expenses.

The so-called Green New Deal 
may cost between 
$51 trillion and $93 trillion 
over 10-years, concludes 
American Action Forum, 
run by Douglas Holtz-Eakin, 
who directed the non-partisan 
Congressional Budget Office
from from 2003 to 2005.

That includes 
$8.3 to $12.3 trillion 
to eliminate 
carbon emissions 
from the power and 
transportation sectors

And $42.8 to $80.6 trillion 
for its economic agenda
including providing jobs 
and health care for all.

"It’s further expansion 
of the federal government’s role 
in some of the most basic decisions 
of daily life, however, would likely 
have a more lasting and damaging

 impact than its enormous price tag."

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.